What is the definition of scale? Scale is the relationship that the depicted feature on map has to its actual size in the real word (more: map scale).
All maps are modeled representations of the real world and therefore the features are reduced in size when mapped.
In other words, scale is the measurement of the amount of reduction a mapped feature has to its actual counterpart on the ground.
Representing scale on a map
All maps will have an indicator of the scale of the map. The purpose of a scale is to show the relationship of the map distance to the ground distance. In other words, how much does a distance measured on the map represent in the real world?
Scales are a ratio of the map units to the real world units.
Map scale units will most often be in one of two measurements systems. The map scale may show metric units such as meters or kilometers. The other common measurement system, particularly in the United States, is to show the map scale in a British imperial unit and United States customary unit of distance such as feet or miles.
A map that doesn’t conform to a specific scale will be indicated by the words “not to scale” (or NTS). This notations is most commonly found on graphic style maps such as the “we are here” or “how to get here” style maps used on invitations.
Since GIS relies on a minimum threshold of accuracy and precision, almost all GIS-based maps will have a scale.
What are the three ways to show scale on a map?
There are three ways to show the scale of a map: graphic (or bar), verbal, and representative fraction.
Types of map scales
Graphic Map Scale
Graphic scales, also know as bar scales, as indicated by the name, show the scale graphically. As the name suggest, this type of map scale is a graphic format.
Some maps will have bars to denote the map units, other graphic map scales will have tick marks to show units.
Some graphic map scales will show both metric and imperial/customary units for reference like the map bar scale below.
Verbal Scale on a Map
A verbal scale is text based, with the scale shown as a number and type of unit measurement equal to a specified unit measurement on the ground. The left side of the verbal is the unit of measurement on the map and the right side of the ratio is the unit measurement on the ground.
For example the verbal scale, 1″ = 100′ means that one inch measured the the map represented 100 feet on the ground. This type of scale is sometimes confused with Representative Fraction scales.
Representative fraction as a scale on a map
Like verbal scale, representative fraction (RF) scale is also a text based scale but no units are shown.
For representative fraction, or ratio scale, scale is a simple ratio of map to ground measurement. Representative fraction is written with numbers on both sides of the colon. The number to the left of colon is the paper, or map, units and the number to the right of the colon is those same units in the real world.
For example, a RF scale of 1 : 1,200 means that every one unit on the map is equal to 1,200 units on the ground. There is no notation of the actual unit type used on a RF scale.
Therefore a RF scale of 1:1,200 is the same scale as a verbal scale of 1″ = 100′.
USGS topographic maps typically have both bar scales and representative fractions (RF). The scale bars on this map from the U.S. Census shows multiple types of map scales.
GIS specific map scale
One type of map scale that is specific to interactive GIS maps is known as dynamic scale and may feature scale-dependent rendering. In digital GIS platforms, scale can dynamically change as one zooms in or out, adapting the level of detail presented.
For example, a view of a region on a small scale (or zoomed out) might only display generalized features such as major cities and major roads. The map scale will also represent a larger area relative to a specific distance on the map. For example, 1″ on the screen may represent 1,000 miles. Zooming in, more fine-grained features will be displayed such as minor roads, towns, and parks. In turn, the map scale will change and 1″ on the screen would change to represent a smaller area — 1″ equals 1 mile, for example.
Large versus small scale maps
Maps are described as either large scale or small scale.
Large scale maps
Large scale maps show a smaller amount of area with a greater amount of detail. The geographic extent shown on a large scale map is small.
A large scaled map expressed as a representative scale would have a smaller number to the right of the ratio. For example, a large scale map could have a RF scale of 1 : 1,000. Large scale maps are typically used to show neighborhoods, a localize area, small towns, etc.
Small scale maps
Small scale maps show a larger geographic area with few details on them. Small scale maps show large areas like countries or huge geographic areas such as continents.
The RF scale of a small scale map would have a much larger number to the right of the colon such as 1 : 1,000,000. Small scale maps are used to show the extent of an entire country, region, or continent.
Why is map scale important in GIS?
GIS technology allow for multi-scale analyses, where different layers can operate at different scales. This has led to more nuanced studies that can, for example, simultaneously consider local land use, regional climate patterns, and global economic factors.
Using data that isn’t at the right scale can lead to false conclusions when doing GIS analysis
While being able to perform spatial analysis on GIS data regardless of the scale, doing so can introduce challenges in data integration and consistency. Just because you can analyze datasets produced at different scales and resolutions, doesn’t mean you should.
For example, if you are looking at the availability of open space for a local city, using a vegetation layer produced at a small scale for an entire country or state would lead to faulty conclusions because the data isn’t fine-grained enough to be useful. You would need a GIS dataset created with the smaller geographic area in mind for your study to be more accurate instead of a dataset created to represent a larger area.
Scale affects feature resolution
The larger the scale of the map, the better the features that can be detailed.
A map that shows the water network of a small area may show the river as a polygon layer and will show the tributaries of that river. A small scale map covering the area would show that same river as a line feature and the tributaries would be removed (a process known as generalization).
The smaller the scale of the map, the less the actual detail of a feature is preserved. Smaller scale maps have river features that have the lines smoothed out whereas a large scale map would show more detail about the twists and turns of that same river.
Why Generalization is Related to Map Scale
So why not show the same level of detail regardless of the map scale? There are two main reasons.
The first reason is the noise level. Showing a lot of detail for features on a small scale map would cause a lot of confusion on the map. By reducing the amount of detail to show only the most important aspects of a feature, the map shows a clearer picture of the area.
The second reason is the file size. Features that have a lot of detail are larger in file size. For a small scale map, loading several large layers will slow down the map production.
An Example of Small Scale Versus Large Scale Representation
Marina del Rey is an area of Los Angeles County that has one of the largest man-made small boat harbors in the United States.
The representation of this harbor on maps of the area is dependent on the scale of the layer used.
The layer showing the counties for the entire United States shown in the image below has a very generalized coast line for this area. The is almost no detail in the coastline and the harbor is not represented at all. (Related: GIS Data and the Coastline Paradox)
The map below shows the same coastline with a layer of all counties for the state of California. While still a small scale layer, the coastline shows more detail. The Marina del Rey harbor is represented by a small inlet on the map.
In a large scale layer created to show just the County of Los Angeles boundary, the coastline for this area contains the highest level of detail, and a recognizable harbor is represented.
The examples of how the detail of a coastline changes depending on the scale of the layer helps to illustrate as well the importance of carefully considering the scale of any data used for mapping and spatial analysis.
Small scale data inherently is less accurate and less detailed than large scale data.
Using small scale data for large scale analysis can lead to gross errors. Data created for small scale purposes should not be used in large scale maps.
Large scale data unless generalized, should not be used in small scale maps.
This article was originally published on September 1, 2011 and has since been updated.
Watch: Large Scale Versus Small Scale Maps
Related Resources
- What’s in a Map? – Understand the basic elements that make up a well formed map.
- Cartographic Resources – Resources for learning more about cartography and cartographic techniques.
- How to Create Firefly Cartography with QGIS
